Build better products with our product team
Be able to sort the Tax Return Status (when customizing) and make certain Status's inactive.
It appears that PTO has taken a step backwards in the name of "collaboration" (a large percentage of users are sole practitioners so we don't need to collaborate with ourselves). I key in 2 sets in the Notes field - one is Carryover applicable year after year, and the other relates to the upcoming year only. The sections are separated by a space.When you set up a 2025 return from a 2024 return (1040), the Notes section is now gone and replaced by a BLANK "Comments" section, again in the name of collaboration (thanks for thinking of us sole practitioners). None of the Notes automatically carry over to the Comments section. If you go back to the 2024 file, the notes are grayed out (as in faded and hard to read) and they are "read-only", which many will assume that you can't copy & paste them to the 2025 Comments section.I went through a lengthy tech support call and the only good thing is that you CAN copy/paste (manually - tedious process) each set of Notes to the Comments section for the following year, but you lose the formatting so my 2 sections all run together and have to be reformatted. I have roughly 200 clients and if nothing is fixed, I will have to do this 200 times.The EASY fix, which should have been obvious to the coding folks, is to have the prior year Notes automatically copy/pasted to the Comments section during the conversion routine from 2024 to 2025. There is still plenty of time before tax season so I IMPLORE the coding folks to fix this and maybe in the future when you are testing a new year's changes to the software, actually pull in someone who has done a tax return online before, because forcing people to go back to the previous year for critical Notes and having them squint at a faded version of the notes is beyond belief, AND also forcing them to do hundreds of manual copy/paste routines to get their years of critical notes into the current year file is NOT fun. The program is supposed to get better every year, not worse.Thanks for fixing this.
Wisconsin S Corporation in Proseries does not include a Form PW-1 which is need to be filed for non-resident shareholders. This is pretty common so is there a way to get this form included into Proseries Professional?
Make it mandatory to make an input in tax withheld and wage fields. If I miss box 17 for example, the system will assume a value of 0 when it was a case of oversight. This can lead to costly errors. If it is truly 0 then force the user to input 0. At a minimum, an error will cause the user to have to go back and check the input source.
There appears to be a calculation issue with tip income entered on Schedule C. The tip amount is not duplicated in the input screens, yet it is being included twice in the calculation, which materially affects net income and related deductions.I have contacted Lacerte, but definitely was not 'heard', I probably should have called back and spoken to somebody else.This does not appear to be user error. The duplication seems to occur within the calculation flow.
When a e-file return is being held by IRS for accuracy check indicate that in the E-File update.
You should not have to pay for current year User Access to print prior year returns when you've already paid a User Access fee. Absolutely greedy and egregious.
Hi there,this is my first year to have a client to set up eletcornic withdraw for the PTE prepayment due by 6/15. I noticed that once I e-filed this return. Lacerte has no e-file activity report to indicate that I have already submitted the auto payment of Pass-through elective estimated tax.Does anyone have ever tried this Auto payment for PTE estimated tax payment? Did it go through well? I'm considering advising my client to make another $1,000 PTE elective payment on FTB website just in case this Lacerte auto withdraw failed and I don't have evidence to shown to FTB.
I don 't understand why there is a checkbox for this to opt in to take the exclusion if they meet the age requirements.
I am a Hawaii resident with a Hawaii Sch C. I also have a Montana Sch K-1 with a rental loss.1. The Montana Form 2, Sch II, line 6a is showing the Hawaii Sch C income as Montana income. I believe this is program error.2. The rental loss is not showing up on line 10a of Schedule II. I exceed the income on the Federal and Hawaii returns so the loss deductible on those returns. The Montana instructions say to enter the income or loss from real property located in Montana, (not the amount from Form 1040 Sch 1, line 5 which was limited) so I believe the loss should be listed on 10a.I've spent and hour and 20 minutes with technical support and I spent an equal amount of time trying to fix it on my own. No success.
© 2026 Intuit Inc. All rights reserved.
Intuit, QuickBooks, QB, TurboTax, ProConnect, Credit Karma, and Mailchimp are registered trademarks of Intuit Inc. Terms and conditions, features, support, pricing, and service options subject to change without notice.
By accessing and using this page you agree to the Terms and Conditions.
© 2026 Intuit Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Intuit et QuickBooks sont des marques déposées d’Intuit, Inc. Les modalités, les fonctions, le soutien, les prix et les options de service peuvent être modifiés sans préavis.
By accessing and using this page you agree to the Terms and Conditions.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK