Build better products with our product team
When printing a partnership return, Proseries currently prints all the K-1s together, and then prints all the Basis Statements together. Like this: K-1 Partner #1, K-1 Partner #2, K-1 Partner #3, etc, followed by Basis Statement Partner #1, Basis Statement Partner #2, Basis Statement Partner #3, etc. This causes a lot of manual collating before sending the K-1s and Basis Statements out to the clients.(Okay, for 3 partners its not a lot of time, but I have a partnership with 200+ partners, and it takes a large number of hours to manually collate the K-1s and the Basis Statements together before sending them out to the partners).Suggestion: When printing a partnership return, give us the option to collate the K-1s and the Basis Statements. Like this: K-1 Partner #1, Basis Statement Partner #1, K-1 Partner #2, Basis Statement Partner #2, K-1 Partner #3, Basis Statement Partner #3, etc.This would make it so much easier to give each partner their K-1 and Basis Statement together, without doing a lot of manual collating.Thanks!
Need to be able eFile Kansas City Profits Tax "KC Form RD-108" for individuals with business profit in the MO 1040 package and also add the form for businesses in the 1120S & C and 1065 modules to have Kansas City Profits Tax and allow it to be eFiled for KC Form RD-108.This is Mandatory as of Jan 1, 2024. I called Jason at ProSeries on Date: 2023-12-27T17:29:26.000+0000 and opened Case Number: 15109639049Whether or not that opened a ticket, I'm not sure but wanted to let you know. I also posted this in theIntuit Accountants Community ProSeries Tax ProSeries Tax Discussionslast week but was told it was better to post it here instead.Thanks.
Is there a way to get to a client's profile without going all the way out of the tax return? It would be nice to see a button an option "Client Profile" under "Client Return Actions" within a tax return.
Need to expand the view of Description in Business other deduction, Because it reate difficulty in internal review of return
For new clients that have already filed a return, but are in need of tax planning, it would be helpful to be able to edit the actual amount column in the tax plan instead of having to prep the return before it's loaded into Intuit Tax Advisor. E.g., new client in mid 2024 already has filed all returns for 2023. In order to have correct actual 2023 amounts in tax plan, the return must be prepared first in Proconnect (even if it's a pro forma version). We should be able to manually edit that column the same as the base year column. It's often significantly more efficient to do that vs. preparing the return in PTO.
Tell us IN the "critical diagnostic" that the returns can be efiled, or not. It's such a waste of time having to call, tell a rep about such a diagnostic, only to have the rep try to solve the problem before realizing it can't be resolved (bad coding for Form 8332 diagnostic, ref # 333) and THEN, finally, telling us, "Oh, you can override that critical diagnostic." Then why is it a "critical" diagnostic? (And is the damned Form 8332 being sent with the efile or not? I've attached it! Three times re-attached!)
If New York City NYC-1127 is check off on screen 1 and screen 54.097 is left blank regarding NYC-1127, form NYC-579-EMP is being generated only when requesting e-signature. Authorization form not generated on preparer review or even listed under NY forms.Need either diagnostic to confirm if NYC forms non-resident forms are required or suppress generating form for e-signature unless screen 54.097 screen is completed.
As of July 2024, there is an input field for the Federal 1031 but no input page for a California 1031. Since the laws are different, the amounts for deferred gain, carryover basis, etc. can be different. My suggestion is to create a separate state input page.
These are now required to be e-filed as of the 2023 tax year. I have been completing them manually, which is unacceptable considering that even Drake supports them. This form should be part of the Professional tax subscription.
ProSeries is splitting all carryforwards 50-50 between taxpayer and spouse. Many of these deductions are specific to one spouse and it is causing returns to be incorrect without keeping manual spreadsheets to track and then override the program. We should at least be able to designate which spouse these carryforwards are for.
We did have the 1310 form signed but failed to upload before sending e-file. If informational diagnostic were listed as critical instead (they are getting a refund), we could have uploading before sending e-file. The return accepted on e-file without that form.
It would be helpful to be able to trace back the information listed on Form 8995 to a worksheet or statement.
I had a ID S-Corp return in which the taxpayer as sole shareholder and his S-Corp business moved from TX to ID in the middle of the year and Lacerte was unable to handle a part year resident return. I spoke to representatives at the ID tax department who indicated that to handle the part year situation we needed to use the allocation method instead of the apportionment method since no income was being taxed in two states at the same time as the taxpayer had no ID income prior to moving. The ID Tax department representative gave me specific line by line instructions on how to handle the circumstance, one of which was to show nothing on the ID K-1 Part IV Column B for ID apportioned items since apportionment didn't apply, and Lacerte was unable to handle this since the taxpayer was listed as an ID resident. Lacerte's only suggestion to fix the issue of the program incorrectly using apportionment for the taxpayer that was listed as a resident was to call them a non-resident, which incorrectly assessed withholding to be made by the S-Corp as it appears non-residents must have their tax paid by the S-Corp via withholding. There is an option to override the withholding in Lacerte, but the fact that the taxpayer is not listed as a resident would generate ID review questions on the missing withholding. However, even if overriding the withholding in Lacerte, there is no option to uncheck the box on the K-1 identifying that it had passthrough withholding, which again will generate ID and maybe taxpayer questions.My suggestion is to include a check box for part year residents like our client so that the apportionment factor is not considered as the ID tax representatives indicated similar to the way Lacerte handles the program when the taxpayer is a non-resident, but not to force the program to withhold taxes since the shareholder will be filing his own ID personal tax return. Since ID does not have a check box to indicate part-year residency, it is best to list the taxpayer as a resident since they resided there the last half of the year.In addition, Lacerte's program does not allow you to update the state's fiscal year in this situation as the start of the ID year (roughly June 15, 2023) does not coincide with the federal return because the entity federally started the year on January 1, 2023. So, I am suggesting an option to modify the start date of the year for the state returns in this situation.
Example: Diagnostic 56662This diagnostic states "Currrently due to a system limitation, Lacerte only allows one activity to be reported on Part IX form for e-file purposes. This return will have to be filed as a conventional paper return."Which form or schedule has the part IX is not stated.
© 2026 Intuit Inc. All rights reserved.
Intuit, QuickBooks, QB, TurboTax, ProConnect, Credit Karma, and Mailchimp are registered trademarks of Intuit Inc. Terms and conditions, features, support, pricing, and service options subject to change without notice.
By accessing and using this page you agree to the Terms and Conditions.
© 2026 Intuit Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Intuit et QuickBooks sont des marques déposées d’Intuit, Inc. Les modalités, les fonctions, le soutien, les prix et les options de service peuvent être modifiés sans préavis.
By accessing and using this page you agree to the Terms and Conditions.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK