Skip to main content
01
Idea
You have a great idea that will improve one of our products.
02
Review
Check out our getting started guide before posting your idea.
03
Submit
Suggest your idea on how to improve our products.
04
Vote
Vote on ideas from other customers to help shape what we build next.
🔔
Idea submission is temporarily unavailable. We're taking a step back to improve this experience from the ground up. You can still browse, vote, and comment on existing ideas while we work on a better submission experience for you.

Filter by idea status

Filter by product

1728 Ideas

PLEASE END THE NY PAIN FOR USNew

I completely understand that the idiocy of NY State is not Intuit's fault. But you have more clout than we do, so please get NYS Tax to make these changes:Eliminate the prohibition on carrying over driver's license info for taxpayer and spouse. As it is in every other state, Proconnect (all your products) warn us if a license expired and prevents e-filng. The idea we have to re-enter this data for every NY return is ridiculous.Eliminate the NY requirement to re-enter checking routing and account numbers. As with other states, we should only have to enter this if different. No NY Tax Pro I know actually keys it in again. We all copy and paste it - so if it's wrong on the Federal it's wrong on NY.Eliminate the ID requirement on an extension. Who cares? NY can get the ID from us when we do the return. If it's good enough for IRS to take an extension without ID, it should be good for NY. This should be especially true of seasoned NY preparers. I've been preparing returns for 35 years with NY and e-filing since the earliest e-filing days. They know I know my clients.Get rid of the brand new really nutty requirement that we include the driver's license info for a spouse on a Married Separate return. Heck, if they're separated it's not likely that the spouse is rushing to cough up their license. The "did not provide option" won't kill the NY critical error - only marking that the spouse doesn't have a license quiets the error. So they're encouraging a lie when the separated spouse isn't in the mood to share license info.All four of these are absolute time killers. A complete waste.And if NY won't cooperate - who knows with them - then make a default setting that satisfies them on 1 to 3 above, that we can override in preferences.We need this yesterday!!! Thank you!

Music23Level 1

Form 8275 should be included in the 2023 ProSeries packageNew

Many Schedule C filers are going to get a big surprise this January, when they receive a 1099-K from Venmo or PayPal. Many clients in this group of 1099-K recipients also will be receiving 1099-NECs from their usual contractors. Often, the contractors pay through Venmo. In light of amounts already reported on the 1099-Ks, contractors will be asked to correct their 1099-NECs. In theory, the contractors should cooperate. In reality, however, there is substantial doubt that many contractors will send corrected 1099-NECs.Unless the standard and acceptable method of reporting discrepancies to the IRS (i.e.: the Form 8275 "Disclosure Statement") is used by the tax preparer, the client is faced with the horrible prospect of "double-reporting" income.At the recent 2023 IRS Nationwide Tax Forum, the instructor emphasized the importance of using Form 8275 to explain the differences between amounts on a submitted 1099-NEC, and the actual amount earned through a contractor. Considering the frequency of Venmo payments in many service industries, tax preparers will have clients who work for contractors who don't want to be bothered with getting their 1099-NECs corrected. Without Form 8275 available in the Pro Series program, the tax preparer is faced with: 1) having to stop work on a return and suspending the Pro Series session; 2) going on the web to IRS forms; 3) filling out the fillable Form 8275; 4) printing a completed Form 8275; 5) scanning it; and 6) returning to Pro Series and attaching the completed 8275 to the client's return. Some tax preparers will need to repeat this process many times per client. All of this extra work outside the Pro Series program is simply unacceptable. Moreover, this scenario will be played out numerous times during the tax year, for tax preparers who have a heavy client base in certain businesses (like entertainment). I'm looking forward to Intuit's response.