Skip to main content
Level 3
May 1, 2026
Question

Kwong v. United States (179 Fed. Cl. 382, Nov. 2025) refund/abatement claims

  • May 1, 2026
  • 4 replies
  • 308 views

 

The suit is about disaster relief provisions enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic that suspended certain federal tax deadlines for more than three years — from January 20, 2020, through July 10, 2023.
 
The ruling affects failure to file, and failure to pay penalties, as well as ES penalties and underpayment interest accrued during that period.  The IRS has appealed the decision, so the law is still unsettled.  July 10, 2026 is the deadline to file a protective Form 843, to stop the statute of limitations.
 
I need to figure out how to query the homebase for years 2019 through 2022 to see who may have a claim. 

4 replies

Just-Lisa-Now-
Intuit Community Champion
May 1, 2026

Many of my clients got unexpected penalty refunds automatically during those years.  Some told me, others didnt, Im not gonna try and track anything more down for anyone.

♪♫•*¨*•.¸¸♥Lisa♥¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪
BobKamman
Level 15
May 1, 2026
IRonMaN
Level 15
May 1, 2026

And I thought this one was the sequel - King Kong vs Godzilla. 😉

Slava Ukraini!
sjrcpa
Level 15
May 1, 2026

When did IRS file their appeal?

The more I know the more I don’t know.
BobKamman
Level 15
May 1, 2026

@sjrcpa The opinion was issued in November, but what I am reading says IRS has not yet appealed.  I'm still recovering from April 15, so I haven't looked into the status of the case, but usually appeals must be filed within a short time period after a final decision.  So, I suspect this is an interlocutory ruling and not a final appealable order.  I'll try to do some research.  

Meanwhile, the National Taxpayer Apologist Advocate blogged about this yesterday, and her fantasy is that

"The IRS should quickly develop a means to allow taxpayers to file their claims electronically and implement it immediately. The IRS and taxpayers do not need paper Forms 843 clogging up the system."

But meanwhile, she advises

"The IRS does not provide immediate confirmation it has received the claim. As a result, taxpayers are well advised to send their refund claims by certified mail so they can prove they timely submitted them in the event they are lost or misplaced."

So save all those receipts and tracking numbers from the returns you mailed just before April 15.  They don't prove the contents of the packages, so you can always claim that they were 843 forms.

https://www.taxpayeradvocate.irs.gov/news/nta-blog/tens-of-millions-of-taxpayers-may-be-eligible-for-significant-tax-refunds/2026/04/ 

BobKamman
Level 15
May 1, 2026

So, this is what AI Slop tells me.  Good enough for now.  Obviously, delay benefits IRS because they would like the clock to run out. I'm not sure how the Kwong lawyers hope to benefit from this case; there are no class actions in federal tax refund practice.  Their client doesn't seem like someone who paid a lot of penalties.  If he's not wealthy, he'll be eligible for attorney fees, so that may be the motivation. 

As of May 2026, there has not yet been a final, appealable judgment entered in the Kwong v. United States case in the Court of Federal Claims, but the parties have taken steps to enable an appeal.

Status of the Case: In late 2025, Judge Molly Silfen* of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims ruled in favor of the taxpayer, holding that COVID-19 tax deadlines were automatically extended to July 10, 2023, under a 2019 statute.

Appealable Order Status: While the ruling is a significant victory, it is not yet a final, non-appealable judgment. As of March 2026, the parties indicated they were preparing a joint motion for a stipulated judgment, which would then allow the government to appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Likelihood of Appeal: The IRS is widely expected to appeal this decision because it challenges their regulation capping disaster relief at one year, and the decision could require refunds of billions of dollars in penalties and interest.

-----

*Judge Silfen, 45, was appointed in February 2023 by President Biden.  Her undergraduate degree is from Yale (in Mechanical Engineering!), and her law degree is from Harvard.  

BobKamman
Level 15
May 23, 2026

Here is what the Manual says:

21.5.3.4.7.3 (10-03-2022)
Protective Claims
1.     Protective Claims may be informal claims, formal claims, or amended returns for credit or refund normally based on expected changes in a Current Regulation, Pending legislation or, Current litigation.
 

2.      Any claim based on a pending court case or decision is considered a Protective Claim. A protective claim can be identified with a literal "protective claim" or similar language or verbiage related to current regulation or pending or current litigation on the claim itself. These claims are filed to protect the claimant's right to recover internal revenue tax before the expiration of the statute of limitations. For this reason, they are all considered to meet CAT-A criteria.

21.5.3.4.7.3.1 (05-05-2023)
Processing Protective Claims
  1. Send all Protective Claims to Examination Classification. If the claim is processable, Exam Classification must make a determination on the claim.

    Note: 

    1.  Prior to forwarding to Examination Classification, ensure the claim is complete and timely.

  2. Do not suspend Protective Claims in Accounts Management inventory, unless the claim is being held for additional information to become processable.

  3. Protective Claims must be processable before sending to Examination Classification. A protective claim:

    • must have a written component;

    • must identify and describe the contingencies affecting the claim;

    • is sufficiently clear and definite to alert the IRS as to the essential nature of the claim;

    • must identify a specific year or years for which a refund is requested.

       

    • Screen all Protective Claims for:

      • Statute timeliness,

        Refer to IRM 25.6.1.10.3.3, Claims for Credit or Refund – General Time Period for Submitting a Claim, for additional information.

      • Signatures.

        4.10.11.2.1.3 (09-04-2020)
        Claims for Refund - Timeliness
        IRC 6402, permits the IRS to make a refund within the applicable period of limitations. IRC 6511 governs the time period for filing a claim as well as the amount that may be recovered.
        In general, a claim is filed on the date it is received at the place designated for filing by the IRS. See IRM 25.6.1.6.15, When a Document Is Treated As Filed Under the IRC, for the rules that may create a different filing date (e.g., Saturday, Sunday, and Legal Holiday rule). The hand-delivery of an amended return to an examiner who is examining the taxpayer’s returns may constitute the filing of a claim. See IRM 25.6.1.10.3.3.1.3, End of the Filing Period, for additional information.
        IRC 6511(a) provides the general rule that a claim for credit or refund must be filed within 3 years from the time the return was filed or 2 years from the time the tax was paid, whichever is later. IRC 6511(b) limits the amount of the credit or refund to the amount paid within the 3 year (2 year) period before the date of a claim. See IRM 4.10.11.5.2, for further discussion on the timeliness requirements for claims for refund.
        In some instances, a claim may be filed by the taxpayer in anticipation of an expected change in the tax law, other legislation, regulations, case law, or other contingency. A "protective claim" is a claim for credit or refund filed by the taxpayer to preserve the right to pursue a refund based on the resolution of an issue contingent on future events that may not be determinable until after the refund statute has expired. Taxpayers file protective claims to ensure they meet the timeliness requirement. With regard to the requirements of form and content, a protective claim must be in writing, include the taxpayer’s name, address, TIN and signature, identify the contingency affecting the claim, be sufficiently clear and definite to alert the IRS as to the essential nature of the claim, and identify the specific year(s) for which the refund is sought. The exact amount of refund requested may not be known at the time the claim is filed. See IRM 25.6.1.10.3.2.5, Protective Claims, for additional information.
        Note: Protective claims filed with the campus are generally forwarded to Technical Services (through PSP) for suspense. The Technical Services Protective Claims Coordinator suspends the case until the contingency is resolved. At that point, if additional information is needed, the case is sent to a group (through PSP) for examination of the claim for refund. Other than noting the timeliness requirement was met by the filing of the protective claim prior to the RSED, there are no differences in how the examiner works the claim for refund. In the event a protective claim is initially filed with the examiner, the examiner should contact their local Technical Services Protective Claims Coordinator for guidance.

      •  

    •  

    •  

    •  

    •  

  4.  

  5.  

Taxes-by-Rocky
Level 7
May 23, 2026

Helpful.

Have used IRM enough in the past but only for cites/references.  Need to locate an overview course on it and spend some more time with it.  Thanks.

P.S.  Will bill but not likely on contingent basis.  The goodwill is worth more...

BobKamman
Level 15
May 23, 2026

@Taxes-by-Rocky  Just do a search for "internal revenue manual" (in quotes) and whatever key words you think a bureaucrat might use.  Then go to links that look like excerpts, they have chapter and verse numbers like 23.10.7.1.18.  That usually gives you about ten times as much text as you want, so use "find" for key words.  IRS employees never do anything without detailed written instructions, and it's all public information except for the secret parts, that are blocked out with ==== ===== .