Skip to main content
dkh
Level 15
February 11, 2023
Question

Home sale exclusion

  • February 11, 2023
  • 6 replies
  • 60 views

Does the following situation qualify taxpayer for Ownership eligibility for the HO exclusion......

Client's son/daughter-in-law rented a house for 1 year then purchased house from landlord.  One year after purchasing they sold the home.   Son/d-in-law's  tax preparer says the year of renting counts towards the required two out of five for ownership.    

My client is concerned because he does not think this correct.   I do not think this correct but I've been known to be wrong on an occasion or two (or three or four........etc etc)    It meets the eligibility test for Residency  not ownership.  Both tests must be met not just one.

Thanks for the help.

This topic has been closed for replies.

6 replies

IRonMaN
Level 15
February 11, 2023

For what it's worth, I've been wrong more than that, but I think that tax preparer is full of crap.

Slava Ukraini!
abctax55
Level 15
February 11, 2023

Rent doesn't convey ownership.  So I say nope.

Was there a lease option?  That doesn't transfer title (or ownership) but maybe, just maybe that other preparer is trying to use that as a rationale?   

 

HumanKind... Be Both
dkh
dkhAuthor
Level 15
February 11, 2023

I don't think so but I'll ask my client. 

abctax55
Level 15
February 11, 2023

Doesn't matter, IMHO.... it doesn't change the situation.  I was just trying to 'read that preparer's mind' cuz it is Sat. afternoon & I'm bored with the work on my desk 🙂

HumanKind... Be Both
Level 15
February 12, 2023

The definitely don't meet the two-year ownership requirement, but it is possible they moved for a qualifying reason in which case they could qualify for a Reduced Maximum Exclusion.

Intuit Community Champion
February 12, 2023

I also concur.....I say no on ownership.

Level 8
February 12, 2023

Did you research the instructions in Pub 17 or sale of home? It is clearly stated there.

abctax55
Level 15
February 12, 2023

Laura, the OP is a pro who has posted here often; he was asking for some back up for his position because another preparer expressed a different one.  The OP stated he disagreed.

Telling him to read the directions/Pub 17 isn't helpful.  It's rude.

 

HumanKind... Be Both
Level 8
February 12, 2023

Not rude...it verifies whether or not he is correct

Just curious...where did you get this: "Tax software is no substitute for a professional tax preparer"

Level 8
February 12, 2023

you must own and occupy...everybody happy now?

IRonMaN
Level 15
February 12, 2023

The pub 17 lady just flew in.  I should have known ——- I thought I heard the wings of flying monkeys heading in this direction.

Slava Ukraini!