Is it ok that the Apportionment Summary says 0% for one state even though I entered numbers and owe tax for that state? How do I fix this if it's a problem?

Forum|Forum|6 years ago
March 11, 2020
1 reply
21 views

No text available

ProConnect Tax Online

This topic has been closed for replies.

Best answer by sjrcpa

The Summary doesn't need to be correct but the tax return does. Is the CA apportionment schedule (R?) correct?

CA has a minimum tax, too.

IRonMaN

Level 15

How did you get it to owe tax if you have zero apportioned?

Slava Ukraini!

E

ErinElevatedAuthor

Level 2

I put the amount of income per state in the correct boxes, and it created the state forms correctly. However on the Multi-State Apportionment Summary it shows CA as 0% -- but that is the state that the client owes. I'm just wondering if the number(s) isn't carrying over to that summary page correctly, or if there is a bigger issue I should be looking for. How important is it to have the Multi-State Apportionment Summary be correct? Is anybody other than my client even looking at that?

sjrcpaAnswer

Level 15

The Summary doesn't need to be correct but the tax return does. Is the CA apportionment schedule (R?) correct?

CA has a minimum tax, too.

The more I know the more I don’t know.

Sign up

Login with SSO

Let's get you signed in

Login with SSO