Skip to main content
Level 10
November 5, 2024
Solved

S Corp

  • November 5, 2024
  • 3 replies
  • 7 views

S Corp with multiple shareholders.   1 shareholder contributed personal assets, no others did.  In the following year, some of the assets were stolen.  Is there a tax law or basis for specially allocating the theft loss to the shareholder who contributed the assets?  

This topic has been closed for replies.
Best answer by IRonMaN

No, you have to stick to ownership percentages

3 replies

IRonMaN
IRonMaNAnswer
Level 15
November 5, 2024

No, you have to stick to ownership percentages

Slava Ukraini!
Level 10
November 5, 2024

Agree.

IRonMaN
Level 15
November 5, 2024

You have some room to play with partnerships, but not S corps.  But Bob will probably show up at some point with some deeply hidden tax provision saying that if you contributed a 1972 Firebird or a building that is exactly 20,000 square feet, you are allowed to allocate the loss to a specific shareholder  😀

Slava Ukraini!
Accountant-Man
Level 13
November 5, 2024

First, how was the property contribution recorded?

Two, it was stolen from the company, not the 1 shareholder.

** I'm still a champion... of the world! Even without The Lounge.
Level 10
November 5, 2024

First, how was the property contribution recorded?

Capital contribution to the SH, and assets recorded on the corporation books

Two, it was stolen from the company, not the 1 shareholder.

Agree.  There are police records that support that and the SH agrees.

 

Accountant-Man
Level 13
November 7, 2024

Right. So the loss is the corp's and must be part of the loss allocated to all SH's.

S corp's do not allow special allocations.

** I'm still a champion... of the world! Even without The Lounge.
PATAX
Level 12
November 5, 2024

I would think that once the assets were contributed to the corporation that they then became assets of the corporation and therefore you would have to use the percentage ownership allocation like Iron Man said.