Skip to main content
Level 2
March 1, 2020
Solved

Redirect 1099misc income to 1120s

  • March 1, 2020
  • 2 replies
  • 25 views

How do you redirect 1099 misc income (box7) to not show on sched.C, but to calculate on 1120S?

This topic has been closed for replies.
Best answer by Strive4Balance

But if the checks were paid to him, it should go on his return.  If he wants it to be reported on the Sub S, then the checks should be paid to the Sub S.  Who is the business agreement with - him and the real estate company or his Sub S and the real estate company?


The agreement is between the r.e. company and the individual.

2 replies

IRonMaN
Level 15
March 1, 2020

Tax preparation doesn't normally involve conducting a magic act.  Who were the checks made out to?  

Slava Ukraini!
Level 2
March 1, 2020

Thank you for responding so quickly.  The 1099 was issued to the individual, under his social, but it's for Real Estate transactions that are conducted under his business (S-Corp).  Another preparer that I work with said to just redirect the income so it doesn't generate a sch.C, but failed to show how to do that in Lacerte.

 

IRonMaN
Level 15
March 1, 2020

But if the checks were paid to him, it should go on his return.  If he wants it to be reported on the Sub S, then the checks should be paid to the Sub S.  Who is the business agreement with - him and the real estate company or his Sub S and the real estate company?

Slava Ukraini!
abctax55
Level 15
March 1, 2020

I would "re-direct" the issuer of the Form 1099 to prepare a corrected on IF appropriate (after answering IronMan's excellent questions.

HumanKind... Be Both
Level 2
March 1, 2020

I agree with your answer and IronMan's questions that are directing me to the answer that I believe to be true.  I guess there's a "right" and "Ethical" way to complete, and then there's a "manipulating the program" to produce an outcome that you want.

qbteachmt
Level 15
March 1, 2020

"I guess there's a "right" and "Ethical" way to complete, and then there's a "manipulating the program" to produce an outcome that you want."

Uh, no; there is the Right way to do it under your professional responsibility, and the "ethical" way would be to confirm the issuing of the 1099-Misc was correct or corrected.

You used the words "the r.e. company and the individual" but didn't clarify is this "r.e. company" is that person's S corp for which they are employed as an employee? Because the individual doesn't get a 1099-M from the S corp for which they work and/or are a shareholder.

Did you perhaps want to give more details with clarity over who is whom and had which role in the issuing of the 1099-M, the recipient of the 1099-M, and the activity that prompted the issuing of the 1099-M?

Don't yell at us; we're volunteers