Skip to main content
Level 2
January 29, 2026
Question

2025 Oklahoma partnership form 561-PTE Line 6

  • January 29, 2026
  • 1 reply
  • 6 views

My client had sold 100% of its assets in 2025.  All assets were located in Oklahoma.  The Oklahoma Capital Gain is flowing correctly to the Form 561-PTE.

But Lacerte is including an amount in Line 6 - Net capital gain apportioned and/or allocated to Oklahoma which reduces the Oklahoma Capital Gain Deduction.  The amount included on the line is roughly 35% of the total gain.

As stated above all of the assets are located in Oklahoma and the taxpayer does 100% of its business in Oklahoma.   So, I was expecting that the amount in Line 6 would equal to qualifying capital gain in Line 5.

Can anyone tell me what is going on?

Thanks,

Larry

 

 

1 reply

Kathi_at_Intuit
Moderator
February 2, 2026

Hi @Lnhcpa52 Great to see you in the Community and thanks for posting about 561-PTE Line 6. We would reach out to Lacerte Support, they will not be able to help with tax law, but they would be able to double-check input and take a look to see if any diagnostics are generating. 

**Click the 👍Thumbs up icon to say thanks on a post, and click Best Answer to mark the post that answered your question.
Lnhcpa52Author
Level 2
February 4, 2026

Kathi:

Thanks for the answer.  I did call Lacerte Support.  I uploaded the client file, and the support tech looked at the file.  But they couldn't really help me. They did mention that the Qualifying Oklahoma net capital gain might be reduced by the unused Section 179 recapture on assets sold. 

I went back and checked some of the assets that were sold and that may be what is happening.  For example, on an asset that was sold for $1,000, with a cost of $50,000 and Section 179 expense of $50,000, $1,000 is reported as other income on Line 6 of Part 3 of the Form 514, and $49,000 is subtracted from the Qualifying Oklahoma Capital Gain reported on Line 6 of the Form 561-PTE.  On another asset that was junked with no sales proceeds that had a cost of $65,000 and Section 179 expense of $65,000, $0 was reported on the Form 514 and $65,000 was subtracted from the Qualifying Oklahoma Capital Gain reported on the 561-PTE 

I was expecting the $1,000 reported on Line 6 of the Form 514 and am okay with it.

But I was not expecting the subtractions from the Qualifying Oklahoma Capital Gain since the $49,000 and the $65,000 unrecaptured Section 179 expense on these two assets did not have anything to do with the gain on the assets that qualified for the Oklahoma Capital Gain.

Does anybody know if this what is supposed to happen?  I have research Internet, OK statutes, and our tax service and cannot find anything on this treatment.

Thanks,

Larry Hull

Kathi_at_Intuit
Moderator
February 5, 2026

@Lnhcpa52 Thanks for the updatd information. Support would not be able to tell you if it was correct or not, they would only be able to help with input and pull up the instructions. Have a great tax season!

**Click the 👍Thumbs up icon to say thanks on a post, and click Best Answer to mark the post that answered your question.